Knowledge in the age of the Internet

2 min read
conclusion-shopping-meme

 

 This meme follows on from the previous one, thematically speaking. What is (true, justified) knowledge today? It is unfortunately to be noted that, generally speaking, we do not draw our convictions from scientific studies, but at most via news articles about such studies. The process that takes place is usually that from a scientific criteria secured knowledge a dilution to a mere opinion takes place. One of the reasons for this is that schools generally do not teach the level of media literacy needed to distinguish between a finding and an opinion. Many news articles are more like a gloss without being labeled as such. But why is it only at university that people learn what "peer reviewed," "meta-study" or "statistical significance" mean? In addition, there is the effect of "confirmation bias," the overabundance of information, and technical reproducibility as an accelerating factor in the distribution of information. Show me a study and I will find you one that "proves" exactly the opposite. To some extent, we are all constantly "conclusion shopping"; we can't help it. But what would be the solution to this? To simply not take everything so seriously? But shouldn't we take precisely issues like social participation, climate change, or worsening social inequality very seriously?

As an extreme to this, conspiracy theories arise and with them the symptom of a scientifically hostile audience, which is to some extent small but very loud. Nonsense is usually spread faster than carefully formulated and considered findings. The accusation of scientism is becoming louder and louder, although this is rarely justified if at least the principle of the fundamental possibility of falsification of a thesis is understood. So what would be the alternative? Also, to impute "postmodernism" as an accusation seems to be exclusively destructive - or should I say "deconstructivist" - in nature. If we haven't heard anything from Karl Popper in school, then we should rather trust the scientists and not the interest- and profit-oriented media houses. In any case, the scientists still seem to be the better choice in terms of gradualism, even if one can impute interests to them, and it would be desirable if this remained the case.


So, you've just finished reading the funniest and most enlightening blog article ever written (we simply like exaggerations). Your mind is blown, your sides ache from laughing, and you would like to enjoy this experience regularly. Here's the kicker: you can simply subscribe to our free memesletter to get just such memes and their explanation delivered to your inbox on a weekly basis. Simply sign up at the bottom of this page!

Additionally you realize that you absolutely need some merch to commemorate this momentous occasion. Well, lucky for you, we've got the perfect selection of witty t-shirts, hilarious mugs, and sassy stickers that will forever remind you of that time you read that incredible blog post. And here's the cherry on top - use the promo code "BLOGREADER" at checkout to get a whopping 15% off your entire order! It's like getting a discount on instant joy and everlasting awesomeness. So go ahead and snag some swag, my friend. You deserve it.


SUBSCRIBE TO OUR MEMESLETTER

You liked this blog post and don't want to miss any new articles? Receive a weekly update with the best philosophy memes on the internet for free and directly by email.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.